No They Aren’t

Slate and the Business Insider want you to know that Isaac Asimov’s predictions about 2014, from 1964, are “eerily accurate.”

Sandor at the Zoo readers know better.

It’s weird to me that anyone would do that.  What’s the point of taking a long list of predictions, many of them hilariously inaccurate, cutting the list down to maybe a quarter of its length, and then calling them “eerily accurate.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s